Okay, folks, it is navel gazing time again here on Floor to Ceiling Books!
Well, actually, it is time to ask a few questions of those bloggers I read regularly to find out their opinions on the subject.
The subject today is: Reviewing!
I would welcome input from all quarters on this one, just to find out how, where, when reviewing takes place.
My questions are:
1) When do you review a book? Immediately, during, after a few days...? (this question was shamelessly stolen from Friday's Book Blogger Hop: I read a few responses and it intrigued me enough to think about a few more questions in the same vein).
2) Do you review every book that you read? What prompts you not to review a book? Do you feel the obligation to review all advance copies you receive?
3) How do you do your reviewing? Making notes as you read or just sitting down and jotting down thoughts and feelings once the whole thing is read?
I think that's enough!
On my part, here are my answers?
1) I always review a book immediately on finishing it, although I am having the thought that perhaps I ought to let the novel percolate for a little while before spilling all my reactions on paper. Sometimes those initial reactions are the most truthful, but other times, without putting distance between myself and the book, I can sometimes be overly effusive or a tad harsh, which I think I wouldn't if I waited.
2) At the moment I am reviewing every book I read. It makes Floor to Ceiling Books a little unfocused in terms of genre at times, I will admit, but I started this blog as a way of recording what I read and what I thought about the book so, under those principles, I am sticking to reviewing everything - good and bad. Having to give a negative review would never stop me from reviewing, but I know others will not post up a review if they hated a book.
3) Sometimes I will dash around the house looking for pen and paper to jot down an immediate reaction to something in a book; I will fold the corner of pages with pertinent quotes; but most often my reviewing is a gush of thoughts and ideas once the whole book is read. This means that sometimes I end up missing things that had occurred during the read, which can be frustrating, but mostly works.
Now...what about you?
SFM: Buckell, Krasnoff, Miller, Herbert
7 hours ago